Common Objections & Rebuttals
Q: Isn’t this program just another form of censorship?
A: No, ReadSafeRatings is entirely voluntary and author-led. Unlike censorship, which removes books from shelves, this program provides neutral, factual information that empowers readers and librarians to make informed decisions—while protecting authors’ creative voices.
Q: Do we really need ratings for books?
A: Many readers, especially parents and librarians, don’t have time to read every book in advance. Ratings provide quick guidance, helping them choose confidently—just like in movies and music.
Q: Won’t these ratings label and stigmatize books?
A: Ratings are neutral and factual—not value judgments. In music and film, similar systems have boosted trust and sales. They make it easier for books to stay on shelves instead of being removed due to vague complaints.
Q: Shouldn’t authors be free to create without explanation?
A: Authors still have full creative control. Ratings are a tool to protect their books and help them reach more readers safely.
Q: Could ratings give ammunition to book banners?
A: Actually, they do the opposite. Ratings provide a clear, objective standard that makes it harder for complaints to be based on personal bias.
Q: Won’t this cost authors money they can’t afford?
A: The program is designed to be affordable and scalable, with multiple pricing tiers. It can pay for itself over time by helping authors retain access to libraries and schools.
Links to Educational Resources
Explore more about why transparency and choice matter in book publishing and libraries:
-
PEN America: Book Bans and Challenges in the United States
https://pen.org/book-bans/ -
Federal Trade Commission 2009 Study:
Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children
https://www.ftc.gov/reports/marketing-violent-entertainment-children-review-industrys-self-regulation -
Texas Authors Museum & Institute of History
[Your Organization’s Website Link Here]
Have another question?
???? Contact us at